| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
18/11/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
14/01/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; BORGES, J.A.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOÃO AUGUSTO ROSSI BORGES, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Which factors can influence the perception of pain by veterinarians and animal scientists from Brazil? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 47, January 2022, Pages 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:Received 29 December 2020/Revised 29 June 2021/Accepted 2 October 2021/Available online 8 October 2021.
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical methods or burdizzo were used for castration and amputation techniques or hot iron, for horn removal. Professionals that perceived higher level of pain in both painful procedures agreed more with the statements ?Farm animals are not as sensitive to pain as pets? and ?If there are no defensive movements, there is no need for pain mitigation use? than those that perceived lower level of pain. The pain estimation is subjective, but our results illustrate the importance of the management and individual/professional aspects on pain perception. Finally, our study highlights that improvement in pain perception by veterinary and animal scientists regarding castration and horn removal in cattle is required. MenosAbstract:
Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal welfare; Attitudes; Beef; Dairy; Husbandry practices; Questionnaire. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03214naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1062528
005 2022-01-14
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aWhich factors can influence the perception of pain by veterinarians and animal scientists from Brazil?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history:Received 29 December 2020/Revised 29 June 2021/Accepted 2 October 2021/Available online 8 October 2021. Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003.
520 $aAbstract: Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical methods or burdizzo were used for castration and amputation techniques or hot iron, for horn removal. Professionals that perceived higher level of pain in both painful procedures agreed more with the statements ?Farm animals are not as sensitive to pain as pets? and ?If there are no defensive movements, there is no need for pain mitigation use? than those that perceived lower level of pain. The pain estimation is subjective, but our results illustrate the importance of the management and individual/professional aspects on pain perception. Finally, our study highlights that improvement in pain perception by veterinary and animal scientists regarding castration and horn removal in cattle is required.
653 $aAnimal welfare
653 $aAttitudes
653 $aBeef
653 $aDairy
653 $aHusbandry practices
653 $aQuestionnaire
700 1 $aBORGES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.J.
773 $tJournal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 47, January 2022, Pages 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
14/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/10/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Ediciones Especiales |
|
Autor : |
AYALA, W.; BEMHAJA, M.; COTRO, B.; DO CANTO, J.; GARCIA, J.; OLMOS, F.; REAL, D.; REBUFFO, M.; REYNO, R.; ROSSI, C.; SILVA, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
WALTER FELIZARDO AYALA SILVERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA DE LURDES BEMHAJA SARAIVA FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUISA BEATRIZ COTRO SOUTO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAVIER DO CANTO FAGUNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAIME ANTONIO GARCIA RADICH, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO ELCEAR OLMOS LOPEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DANIEL REAL FERREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MONICA IRENE REBUFFO GFELLER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; RAFAEL ALEJANDRO REYNO PODESTA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS ALBERTO ROSSI RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE ANTONIO SILVA RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Forrajeras: Catálogo de cultivares 2010. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2010. |
|
Páginas : |
131 p |
|
Serie : |
(INIA Otros Documentos ; 38) |
|
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-292-3. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Contiene fechas de floración de las gramíneas forrajeras de INIA |
|
Palabras claves : |
CEBADILLA; PASTO ELEFANTE; SUDANGRAS; TREBOL BLANCO; TREBOL ROJO. |
|
Thesagro : |
ACHICORIA; ALFALFA; AVENA; AVENA BYZANTINA; AVENA SATIVA; BROMUS; DACTYLIS GLOMERATA; FESTUCA; FESTULOLIUM; GRAMINEAS FORRAJERAS; HOLCUS LANATUS; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM; LOLIUM PERENNE; LOTUS CORNICULATUS; ORNITHOPUS; PENNISETUM PURPUREUM; PHALARIS AQUATICA; PLANTAS FORRAJERAS; TRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM; TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE; TRIFOLIUM REPENS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
--
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/1810/1/18429300810155513.pdf
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3217/1/Catalogo-de-cultivares.Forrajeras.18429300810155513.pdf
http://www.inia.uy/Publicaciones/Documentos%20compartidos/18429300810155513.pdf
http://www.inia.uy/Publicaciones/Paginas/publicacion-2133.aspx
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01499nam a2200577 a 4500
001 1003244
005 2022-10-07
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aAYALA, W.
245 $aForrajeras$bCatálogo de cultivares 2010.
260 $aMontevideo (UY): INIA$c2010
300 $a131 p
490 $a(INIA Otros Documentos ; 38)
500 $aContiene fechas de floración de las gramíneas forrajeras de INIA
650 $aACHICORIA
650 $aALFALFA
650 $aAVENA
650 $aAVENA BYZANTINA
650 $aAVENA SATIVA
650 $aBROMUS
650 $aDACTYLIS GLOMERATA
650 $aFESTUCA
650 $aFESTULOLIUM
650 $aGRAMINEAS FORRAJERAS
650 $aHOLCUS LANATUS
650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS
650 $aLOLIUM MULTIFLORUM
650 $aLOLIUM PERENNE
650 $aLOTUS CORNICULATUS
650 $aORNITHOPUS
650 $aPENNISETUM PURPUREUM
650 $aPHALARIS AQUATICA
650 $aPLANTAS FORRAJERAS
650 $aTRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM
650 $aTRIFOLIUM PRATENSE
650 $aTRIFOLIUM REPENS
653 $aCEBADILLA
653 $aPASTO ELEFANTE
653 $aSUDANGRAS
653 $aTREBOL BLANCO
653 $aTREBOL ROJO
700 1 $aBEMHAJA, M.
700 1 $aCOTRO, B.
700 1 $aDO CANTO, J.
700 1 $aGARCIA, J.
700 1 $aOLMOS, F.
700 1 $aREAL, D.
700 1 $aREBUFFO, M.
700 1 $aREYNO, R.
700 1 $aROSSI, C.
700 1 $aSILVA, J.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
